Clinical AI Radar

2026-10-06

Machine learning evaluated on patients, from new PubMed records — not preprints.

97papers read
→
6shortlisted
→
4must-read

7 s · 98,041 input tokens · ≈ $0.0041 · jev-1.13.0 via typesafe

Must-read ≥ 95%

98%applicationpubmed

Intratumoral and Peritumoral Ultrasoundomics Models for Preoperative Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Zhou P, Yang L, He Y et al. · Acad Radiol

External validation 98%
Abstract

Rationale And Objectives: This study investigated the clinical utility of a machine learning (ML) model based on ultrasoundomics features (UFs) from primary foci to predict pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer (BC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Materials And Methods: Ultrasound images from 333 patients with BC treated with NAC were retrospectively analyzed. Patients in the internal training cohort and external validation cohort were from two different hospitals, respectively. Tumor regions of interest (ROI) were delineated, and outward segmentation of the peritumor area was performed, using the ROI edge as a baseline and expanding it by 3 mm and 5 mm, respectively. This resulted in three distinct segmentation images: ROI (intratumoral region), ROI (intratumoral region + 3-mm peritumoral region), and ROI (intratumoral region + 5-mm peritumoral region). Three sets of UFs were extracted, normalized using the Z-score method, and further refined through Spearman correlation analysis and LASSO for feature selection. Eight ML models (R0), based on key UFs in ROI (intratumoral region), were compared: support vector machine, K-nearest neighbor, random forest, Naïve Bayes, logistic regression, AdaBoost (AB), multilayer perceptron, and light gradient boosting machine learning. The optimal ML models were evaluated using diagnostic performance metrics, including AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The best-performing algorithm was then applied to construct ML models (R3 and R5) incorporating ROI (intratumoral region + 3-mm peritumoral region) and ROI (intratumoral region + 5-mm peritumoral region). Predictive efficacy and clinical utility were assessed through decision curve analysis (DCA) and Shapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP), which quantified feature importance and facilitated model visualization and interpretation. Results: Among the 333 patients, 119 (35.7%) achieved pCR, while 214 (64.3%) did not. Among the eight ML algorithms, the R0 model based on AB demonstrated the best performance, with an AUC of 0.811 (Internal training cohort) and 0.632 (External validation cohort). The R3 model also showed improved performance, with an AUC of 0.830 (Internal training cohort) and 0.699 (External validation cohort). The R5 model yielded the highest predictive accuracy, with an AUC of 0.871 (Internal training cohort) and 0.779 (External validation cohort). SHAP analysis was conducted for R5, and SHAP waterfall charts enable single-sample predictions to validate the model's clinical utility. DCA revealed that the combination of intratumoral region and 5-mm peritumoral region in R5 offered superior clinical benefit. Conclusion: ML models integrating intratumoral and peritumoral ultrasoundomics offer valuable assistance in assessing NAC efficacy in patients with BC.

pubmed:42833974Useful?👍👎
98%new methodpubmed

Comprehensive Aortic Stenosis Characterization Using Multiview Deep Learning.

Ieki H, Sahashi Y, Vukadinovic M et al. · JACC Cardiovasc Imaging

External validation 98%
Abstract

Background: Accurate assessment of aortic stenosis (AS) requires integration of both structural and functional information characterized by visual traits as well as quantitation of gradients. Existing artificial intelligence models use solely either structural or functional information. Objectives: The authors aimed to develop and validate an automated multiview deep learning framework to assess AS severity. Methods: The authors developed EchoNet-AS, an open-source end-to-end integrated approach combining video-based convolutional neural networks to assess valve motion with segmentation models to automate measurement of aortic valve peak velocity and classify AS severity. Results: EchoNet-AS was trained on 210,193 images from 16,076 studies from KPNC (Kaiser Permanente Northern California) and validated on 1,588 held-out test studies and a temporally distinct cohort of 19,202 studies. The final model was also externally validated on 2,415 studies from SHC (Stanford Healthcare) and 9,038 studies from CSMC (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center). Combining assessments from multiple echocardiographic videos and Doppler measurements, EchoNet-AS achieved excellent discrimination of severe AS with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.964 (95% CI: 0.952-0.973) in the KPNC held-out cohort and 0.986 (0.983-0.989) in the temporally distinct cohort, which was superior to models using single views or only Doppler measurements. The performance was consistently robust in distinct external cohorts with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.985 (0.975-0.992) at SHC and 0.989 (0.986-0.992) at CSMC. Conclusions: EchoNet-AS synthesizes information from both B-mode videos and Doppler images to accurately assess AS severity. Its strong performance generalizes robustly to external validation cohorts and shows potential as an automated clinical decision support tool.

pubmed:42833794Useful?👍👎
95%new methodpubmed

Dual-Foundation-Model Ensemble Predicts Gene Expression in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer for Patient Outcome Stratification.

Mathisen IF, Koll FJ, Mayer RS et al. · Mod Pathol

External validation 95%
Abstract

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) exhibits significant heterogeneity in clinical outcomes and treatment responses. While gene expression profiling has provided important biological and prognostic insight, transcriptomic assays are not routinely incorporated into standard clinical practice, in part due to cost. AI models have been demonstrated to predict gene expression from H&E-stain whole-slide images (WSIs) potentially offering a scalable approach for gathering transcriptomic information for patient stratification and biomarker discovery. We developed and tested models to predict expression of 857 genes directly from H&E-stained whole-slide images (WSI). The best performing final model was a dual-ensemble combining predictions from models trained on features extracted with different foundation models. The dual-ensemble reached 776/857 predictable genes with an average correlation of 0.43 (cross-validation), 0.45 (holdout) and 0.40 (external Frankfurt cohort). Predicted expression strongly correlates with expression of clinically relevant markers (like NECTIN4). Estimated hazard ratios of predicted expression correlated strongly with those of measured expression and genes associated with overall survival for both predicted and measured expression in both cohorts were identified. AI-predicted basal vs. luminal subtypes were associated with overall survival and aligned with the ground-truth (accuracies > 0.8). Findings demonstrate that gene expressions inferred from routine staining can support biomarker discovery and patient stratification in MIBC.

pubmed:42833291Useful?👍👎
95%new methodpubmed

Platform-Agnostic Quantification for Molecular Interception of Oral and Esophageal Malignancies: A Global Study Addressing Diagnostic Divide.

Lai HM, Liu HP, Douglas K et al. · JNCI Cancer Spectr

External validation 95%
Abstract

Background: Oral and esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC/ESCC) are commonly diagnosed late since histopathology is subjective and robust molecular tools are lacking. Leveraging interpretable machine learning, we aimed to develop an objective and platform-agnostic molecular measure of malignancy that overcomes the technical and geographic barriers of conventional genomic testing. Methods: Using a discovery-to-generalization framework with 2,541 samples, we developed and validated a single-sample transcriptomic scoring system, EsoralPrint. We feature engineered 34 intra-sample ordinal gene pairs (isoPairs) that capture consistent expression-order reversals between malignant and healthy states. It was trained on oral tissues and externally validated across diverse global cohorts spanning the upper aerodigestive tract, technical platforms, and geographic regions. Independent single-cell RNA sequencing was used to provide post-hoc mechanistic explainability. Results: In the discovery cohort, EsoralPrint distinguished patients histologically graded as low-risk hyperplasia who nonetheless progressed to cancer (log-rank p < 0.0001); we treat this result as exploratory pending independent confirmation. In external validations, EsoralPrint reached 95.0% accuracy and 96.7% F1-score across OSCC cohorts (460 OSCC, 162 non-OSCC) and 91.6% accuracy and 91.6% F1-score in esophageal tissue unseen during discovery and training (574 ESCC, 614 healthy mucosa). Further, a malignancy gradient reflecting field cancerization effects in resection boundaries was observed, and a transition zone (scores 0.25-0.75) was defined where molecular alterations preceded morphological changes. Conclusion: EsoralPrint provides a platform-independent and quantitative complement to histological grading in oral and esophageal squamous malignancy, with the potential to give clinicians lead time for intervention. It can be accessed via https://github.com/aiphaqua/EsoralPrint.

pubmed:42832310Useful?👍👎

Maybe 90% to 95%

93%empirical studypubmed

EDIT-B consortium: an external pan-European validation of an innovative machine learning-based test for bipolar disorder diagnosis.

Weissmann D, Salvetat N, Cayzac C et al. · BMJ Ment Health

External validation 93%Prospective 72%
Abstract

Background: Differentiating bipolar disorder (BD) from major depressive disorder (MDD) during major depressive episodes remains a significant challenge. EDIT-B is an in vitro diagnostic test based on machine learning (ML) method integrating clinical metadata with adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing signatures in eight genes (GAB2, IFNAR1, IL17RA, LYN, MDM2, PRKCB, PTPRC, ZNF267) to differentiate BD from MDD. Objective: The objective of this study is to assess and confirm the diagnostic performance of EDIT-B in a new, independent, double-blind, external, multicentre European cohort. Methods: We evaluated EDIT-B results across four European centres (Spain, France, Denmark) compared with physician diagnoses. Explainability and sensitivity analyses were performed to identify the primary drivers of the model. Findings: In 393 patients with current major depressive episode (238 MDD; 155 BD), EDIT-B demonstrated robust performance: area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic of 0.873 (95% CI 0.837 to 0.909), sensitivity of 82.6% (95% CI 75.7% to 88.2%) and specificity of 80.3% (95% CI 74.6% to 85.1%). Performances were consistent across sites and all stratified patient subgroups, corroborating previous results. Explainability analysis pointed to RNA editing biomarkers as the most important variables for EDIT-B diagnosis. Conclusion: This study confirms the diagnostic performances of EDIT-B showing that A-to-I RNA editing coupled with ML methods is a reliable approach to distinguish BD from MDD. Clinical Implications: EDIT-B represents an innovative, reliable and complementary diagnostic tool supporting psychiatric practice and enhancing clinical outcomes with potential impact in reducing diagnostic delays, tailoring the therapeutic strategy and improving therapeutic alliances. These findings may represent a significant advance towards precision psychiatry, with potential to reduce misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. Trial Registration Number: NCT05603819.

pubmed:42833865Useful?👍👎
93%new methodpubmed

Transformer-based decision support with CNN and ViT for prognostic risk stratification following adjuvant chemotherapy in high-grade glioma: a multicenter study.

Li Z, Duan X, Lian J et al. · Comput Methods Programs Biomed

External validation 93%
Abstract

Background: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) exhibit marked intratumoral heterogeneity, which is associated with variable survival outcomes among patients receiving standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Conventional methods relying on molecular biomarkers are constrained by technical limitations and tumor heterogeneity. This study aimed to develop a multi-channel 2.5D deep learning framework that integrates Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Vision Transformer (ViT) features to noninvasively stratify HGG patients based on expected survival outcomes following postoperative adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy and to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms. Methods: Multicenter MRI data (T1-CE/T2-FLAIR; n=507) were analyzed using habitat clustering to define tumor subregions. A 2.5D multi-channel strategy was employed to extract features via ResNeXt101_32 × 8d (CNN) and ViT, which were then integrated using a Transformer fusion model. Transcriptomic analyses, including differential expression, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis, were performed to biologically validate the imaging-based predictions. Model performance was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier/log-rank test). Results: The fusion model demonstrated superior performance, consistently outperforming both CNN and ViT models across training (AUC = 0.950, 95% CI: 0.917-0.982), internal-test (0.828, 0.720-0.937), and external-validation (0.810, 0.710-0.911) cohorts. Transcriptomic validation confirmed significant enrichment of cell cycle and DNA damage response pathways in the low-risk patient group, with CHEK1, CDK1, and FEN1 identified as key regulatory genes. Conclusion: This approach demonstrates robust, non-invasive performance in stratifying HGG patients into prognostically distinct subgroups with differential survival trajectories following post-radiotherapy TMZ chemotherapy. The association with DNA damage response pathways provides biological interpretability, supporting prognostic risk stratification and providing a reference for postoperative surveillance planning.

pubmed:42832939Useful?👍👎